Saladin, born Yusuf ibn Ayyub in 1137 or 1138, was a Kurdish Muslim leader who rose to become the first sultan of both Egypt and Syria. He is best known for his role in the Crusades, particularly for his leadership during the campaign that recaptured Jerusalem from the Crusader states in 1187. Saladin’s legacy is marked by his military prowess, administrative skill, and reputation for honourable conduct, even among his adversaries.
Early Life and Rise to Power
Saladin was born in Tikrit, in modern-day Iraq, into a Kurdish family connected to the Zengid dynasty. His formative years were shaped by the politics of the Near East and the influence of his uncle Shirkuh, a general under the powerful Zengid ruler Nur ad-Din. Saladin initially served under Shirkuh during military expeditions in Egypt, eventually succeeding him as vizier in 1169. After Nur ad-Din’s death in 1174, Saladin gradually consolidated control over Syria, uniting Egypt and much of the Levant under the Ayyubid dynasty which he founded.
Military Career and the Crusades
Saladin’s military reputation was forged through a series of campaigns aimed at consolidating Muslim control of the Near East and resisting the European Crusader states. His most significant achievement came in 1187 at the Battle of Hattin, where his forces decisively defeated the army of the Latin Kingdom of Jerusalem. This victory led to the fall of Jerusalem and a chain reaction of Crusader losses across the region.
In response, the Third Crusade was launched by European monarchs including Richard the Lionheart of England. The campaign led to a series of hard-fought engagements between Saladin and the Crusaders, including the Siege of Acre and the Battle of Arsuf. Although the Crusaders regained some coastal cities, Saladin managed to retain control of Jerusalem. The war concluded in 1192 with the Treaty of Jaffa, which allowed Christian pilgrims access to the city while it remained under Muslim rule.
Leadership and Governance
Saladin was not merely a military commander. His rule was marked by efforts to stabilise and administer the territories under his control. He reorganised the bureaucracy, ensured relative religious tolerance within his domains, and maintained a strong emphasis on Islamic unity. Though he could be ruthless in war, he often treated prisoners with unexpected clemency. His personal piety and frugal lifestyle distinguished him from many other rulers of his time.
Arms and Armour
Saladin’s forces were composed of a mix of professional soldiers, tribal levies, and elite Mamluk cavalry. The typical equipment of his armies reflected a blend of Islamic and Central Asian martial traditions.
Saladin’s personal bodyguard would likely have been armed with curved sabres, possibly early forms of the kilij or scimitar, which were effective for mounted combat. Chainmail hauberks and lamellar armour were commonly used among his elite troops, offering flexibility and protection in the field. Helmets often followed the conical shape typical of Turkic and Persian styles, sometimes reinforced with nasal guards or mail coifs.
Shields were generally round or kite-shaped, constructed from wood or leather over a metal frame. Archery played a central role in Saladin’s forces. Horse archers using composite bows were a tactical advantage over the heavier, less mobile knights of the Crusader armies. In siege warfare, his troops made use of mangonels, battering rams, and mining operations, often adopting and improving techniques from Byzantine and Persian traditions.
Saladin himself, while not a frontline berserker, would have worn finely crafted mail or scale armour suitable for a high-ranking commander. Contemporary chroniclers describe him as calm and composed in battle, directing operations with discipline and restraint rather than reckless charge.
Kilij (Early Form)
While the classic Ottoman kilij as we know it did not exist yet in Saladin’s time, its precursors were already in use. These early curved sabres came from Central Asian Turkic cavalry traditions and were valued for their cutting power, especially from horseback.
These sabres had:
- A moderately curved, single-edged blade
- A widened tip (yelman) beginning to appear, allowing for deep cuts
- Crossguards that were typically straight or slightly curved forward
- Grip styles influenced by steppe and Persian designs
Saladin’s elite Turkish and Kurdish cavalry, including his personal guard, would have used these. They were ideal for hit-and-run tactics and slicing attacks in cavalry combat.
Straight Double-Edged Swords (Saif or Shamshir Predecessors)
Arab swords in earlier centuries tended to be straight and double-edged. Some troops, especially Arab infantry or older traditionalist units, may still have carried these. These saifs were similar to spathae or Roman-style blades but evolved in the Islamic world for their own martial contexts.
Features included:
- Straight, double-edged blades
- Simple crossguards
- Used more for thrusting and slashing on foot
- Typically carried by tribal levies or lower-status troops
By the 12th century, however, curved sabres were becoming more dominant due to their effectiveness in mounted warfare.
Persian Shamshir (Proto-Type)
The fully developed Persian shamshir, known for its extreme curvature, would come later, but its early forms likely influenced Ayyubid weaponry. Saladin’s Persian allies and Mamluk troops may have carried similar swords with narrow, deeply curved blades optimised for slashing.
These would have featured:
- Lightweight, curved blades
- Grip suited for single-handed cavalry use
- Decorative features in elite units, possibly with inlaid silver or calligraphy
Mamluk Blades
The Mamluks, who would later dominate Egypt after the Ayyubids, were already present as elite slave-soldiers in Saladin’s army. Their blades would have reflected a hybrid of Central Asian and Islamic styles. A Mamluk’s sword would be well-balanced for mounted combat and often of high craftsmanship.
Infantry Swords
Common infantry troops might have carried simpler, more rugged swords. These could be short, straight, or slightly curved, mass-produced in arsenals with functional iron or steel blades. Their simplicity made them easier to forge and maintain in large quantities.
Decorative and Ceremonial Swords
Saladin himself likely possessed finely crafted swords for ceremonial use. These would have featured:
- Inscriptions of Qur’anic verses or the names of Allah
- Gold or silver embellishments
- Decorated scabbards of wood and leather, sometimes inlaid with ivory or gem-like fittings
While he probably wore practical mail and a combat sword in the field, the more ornate blades would have been reserved for court appearances or diplomacy.
Death and Legacy
Saladin died in Damascus in 1193. Though he had amassed a powerful empire, he left little wealth behind, having donated much of his fortune to charity and religious institutions. His death marked the beginning of the slow fragmentation of the Ayyubid domains.
He remains a revered figure in Islamic history and is often portrayed in European accounts as a chivalrous adversary. Medieval Christian chroniclers, despite fighting against him, frequently described him with a respect not afforded to many of their own rulers. Modern historians continue to debate his political motives and the true extent of his piety, but his impact on the Crusades and on the medieval Middle East is unquestioned.
Saladin was a figure of exceptional strategic insight, political tact, and cultural influence. He managed to rally diverse Muslim factions under a single cause and achieved one of the most significant victories in the history of the Crusades. His blend of military acumen and magnanimity ensured his place not only in Muslim memory but also in the annals of medieval history more broadly.
Watch the documentary:
