The Battle of the Hydaspes, fought in May 326 BCE near the banks of the Jhelum River (ancient Hydaspes) in modern-day Pakistan, marked one of Alexander the Great’s most tactically challenging and symbolically significant victories. This confrontation between Macedonian forces and the Indian king Porus was a test of endurance, adaptability, and leadership on both sides.
Historical Background
Following his victories across the Persian Empire, Alexander pushed eastward, determined to extend his conquests beyond the known boundaries of the Achaemenid realm. His march into the Punjab brought him into conflict with King Porus, a powerful local ruler commanding a large army, including war elephants unfamiliar to Macedonian forces.
Despite facing logistical challenges, monsoon rains, and a numerically superior enemy, Alexander crossed the swollen river under cover of night and launched a surprise attack.
Forces Involved
| Side | Estimated Troop Numbers | Composition |
|---|---|---|
| Macedonian Army | 30,000 infantry 5,000 cavalry | Macedonian phalanx, Companion cavalry, skirmishers, archers, Thracians, Agrianians |
| Porus’ Army | 30,000–50,000 infantry 3,000–4,000 cavalry 200–300 war elephants | Indian infantry, chariots (few in number), cavalry, archers, and elephant corps |
Leaders and Command
Alexander the Great (Macedonian side)
- Supreme commander
- Supported by officers including Coenus, Hephaestion, Perdiccas, and Ptolemy
- Personally led cavalry during the flanking manoeuvre
Porus (Indian side)
- Local king and commander-in-chief
- Rode atop a war elephant
- Noted for exceptional bravery and imposing stature
Contemporary accounts, especially those of Arrian and Curtius Rufus, record that even in defeat, Porus maintained his dignity. When Alexander asked how he wished to be treated, Porus is said to have replied, “Like a king.” Alexander reportedly honoured this request.
Arms and Armour
Macedonian Forces:
- Swords: Kopis and Xiphos were standard sidearms. The kopis, with its forward-curving blade, was preferred by cavalry for its cutting power. The xiphos, a short thrusting sword, was used by infantrymen alongside their spears.
- Primary Weapon: The sarissa, a long pike over 4 metres in length, defined the phalanx’s reach and discipline.
- Armour: Most elite troops wore bronze muscle cuirasses or linothorax (layered linen), greaves, and helmets such as the Phrygian and Boeotian styles.
- Shields: The aspis, a round hoplite shield, was used by some infantry, while lighter troops carried pelte shields.
Porus’ Army:
- Swords: Indian warriors wielded curved blades akin to the talwar, with single-edged construction suited for slashing. Straight double-edged blades, likely akin to the khanda, were also used by elite fighters.
- Projectile Weapons: Archers using powerful longbows were a key component of Porus’ forces. Their bows were often made of bamboo, capable of strong draw weights.
- Elephants: Armoured in chain or scale, with tusks sometimes reinforced with iron. Mahouts (drivers) guided them, while warriors fought from the platform or howdah.
- Armour: Elite troops may have worn scale or padded armour. Infantry typically wore little body armour due to heat and mobility concerns. Shields were round or elongated, often made from leather and cane.
Tactics and Course of the Battle
Alexander first created a diversion by leaving Craterus with part of his force in a visible location, while leading a select contingent across the river upstream under cover of darkness and rain. The risky crossing succeeded, and Porus was caught off guard.
Alexander’s cavalry assaulted the Indian flank, while his phalanx pinned Porus’ forces frontally. The war elephants caused initial chaos, but Macedonian agility and coordinated attacks eventually blunted their impact. Archers targeted mahouts and elephant eyes. As elephants panicked, they trampled their own men.
Eventually, Porus was wounded and captured. His troops, demoralised and leaderless, surrendered or fled.
Archaeology and Geography
No definitive battlefield excavations have confirmed the exact site of the Hydaspes. Most scholars place it near modern-day Jalalpur Sharif, Pakistan. The monsoon-altered course of the Jhelum River has complicated efforts to identify artefacts or burial sites.
However, historical records and geographical surveys suggest several key elements:
- The crossing likely took place during a storm, obscuring visibility.
- Terrain included riverbanks, muddy floodplains, and open fields suitable for elephants and cavalry manoeuvres.
Artefactual evidence remains scant. Most information comes from Greek sources written decades later. No local Indian accounts survive from the time of Porus.
Battle Timeline
| Date | Event |
|---|---|
| Late Spring 326 BCE | Alexander’s army reaches the Hydaspes River |
| Midnight – pre-dawn | Alexander splits his forces; crosses upriver under storm cover |
| Morning | Porus receives intelligence but underestimates the crossing threat |
| Mid-morning | Alexander’s cavalry strikes Porus’ flank while infantry engage frontally |
| Late morning to noon | Elephant charge disrupts phalanx briefly but is countered |
| Afternoon | Porus is wounded and captured; his army collapses |
Legacy
The Battle of the Hydaspes was the last major confrontation of Alexander’s eastern campaign. While victorious, his army refused to march further into India after seeing the strength of local forces. The encounter also demonstrated his adaptability in foreign terrain against unfamiliar tactics.
Alexander’s treatment of Porus, reinstating him as a regional ruler, highlights both political pragmatism and admiration for bravery. The battle remains one of antiquity’s best examples of a Western army confronting a sophisticated Eastern power with vastly different warfare traditions.
Arrian summarised the awe of Alexander’s men with the words:
“They were astonished, not by the strength of the enemy alone, but by the great courage and discipline they showed in battle.”
Watch the documentary:
