
The Battle of Hastings, fought on 14 October 1066 near Hastings in East Sussex, was a pivotal clash between William, Duke of Normandy, and King Harold Godwinson of England. This single day altered the course of English history, leading to Norman domination and the eventual consolidation of a new monarchy under William the Conqueror.
Background: The Road to War
The battle was the culmination of a succession crisis following the death of Edward the Confessor in January 1066. Three key claimants emerged:
- Harold Godwinson – Crowned king by the Witenagemot (England’s council of nobles).
- William of Normandy – Claimed Edward had promised him the throne and that Harold had sworn an oath to support his claim.
- Harald Hardrada of Norway – Invaded northern England but was defeated by Harold at the Battle of Stamford Bridge (25 September 1066).

Just days after this hard-fought victory, Harold marched his exhausted army 250 miles south to confront William, who had landed near Pevensey on 28 September.
The Armies: Strengths and Weaknesses
The Norman Forces (7,000–8,000 men)
- Composition: Normans, Bretons, and French mercenaries.
- Infantry: Spearmen and swordsmen forming the bulk of the army.
- Archers: Crucial in weakening enemy lines before melee combat.
- Cavalry: Mounted knights armed with lances, William’s greatest tactical advantage.
The Anglo-Saxon Forces (7,000 men)
- Housecarls: Elite professional warriors wielding two-handed axes.
- Fyrd: Conscripted farmers and local levies, less experienced but determined.
- Shield Wall: A near-impenetrable defensive formation.
- Weaknesses: No cavalry, limited archers, and fatigue from forced marches.
Tactical Breakdown: The Battle Unfolds
Phase 1: The Norman Advance (Morning)
- William’s forces advanced in three divisions: Normans (centre), Bretons (left), and Franco-Flemish (right).
- Norman archers fired uphill, but their arrows had little effect against the Saxon shield wall.
Phase 2: The Feigned Retreat (Midday)
- After initial Norman infantry attacks failed, William’s Bretons on the left flank pretended to flee, breaking discipline in parts of Harold’s army.
- Saxon fyrd troops pursued downhill, only to be cut down by Norman cavalry.
Phase 3: The Death of Harold (Late Afternoon)
- Repeated Norman cavalry charges gradually weakened the shield wall.
- Harold was killed, likely by a Norman knight’s sword blow, though legend claims an arrow struck his eye.
- Leaderless, the Saxon army collapsed, and William secured victory.

Weaponry of the Battle of Hastings: Anglo-Saxon vs. Norman Arms
The Battle of Hastings was defined not just by tactics but by the distinct weapons wielded by each army. The Anglo-Saxons relied on heavy infantry and defensive formations, while the Normans employed a combined-arms approach with archers, cavalry, and disciplined foot soldiers. Below is a detailed breakdown of the arms used by both forces.
Anglo-Saxon Weaponry
The English army, composed primarily of housecarls (elite warriors) and fyrd (levied farmers), favoured close-quarters combat with sturdy, brutal weapons designed for shield-wall warfare.
Melee Weapons
- Two-Handed Dane Axe
- Primary User: Housecarls
- Description: A massive, long-hafted axe with a broad, crescent-shaped blade.
- Use: Devastating against shields and armour, capable of cleaving through multiple foes.
- Limitation: Required space to swing, making it less effective in tightly packed formations.
- Swords
- Type: Pattern-welded, double-edged broadswords (e.g., Ulfberht swords).
- Length: ~75–90 cm (30–35 inches).
- Use: Secondary weapon for housecarls, ideal for slashing and thrusting.
- Limitation: Expensive, mostly carried by nobles and elite warriors.
- Spears
- Primary User: Fyrd levies
- Length: 2–3 metres (6–10 feet).
- Use: The most common weapon, used for thrusting over shields in the shield wall.
- Tactical Role: Extended reach kept cavalry at bay.
- Seaxes (Long Knives)
- Type: Single-edged utility blades (~30–60 cm).
- Use: Backup weapon for close combat if spears broke.
Defensive Equipment
- Round Shields (Linden Wood)
- Diameter: ~90 cm (3 feet).
- Construction: Wooden planks covered in leather, with a central iron boss for punching.
- Tactical Role: The backbone of the shield wall, forming an interlocked barrier.
- Body Armour
- Housecarls: Chainmail hauberks (knee-length), conical helmets with nasal guards.
- Fyrd: Mostly unarmoured or wearing padded gambesons; some had leather or iron-rimmed helmets.
Ranged Weapons (Limited Use)
- Javelins & Throwing Axes
- Occasionally used to disrupt enemy advances before melee.
- Bows
- Rare among Anglo-Saxons at Hastings, mostly hunting bows, not battlefield-effective.
Norman Weaponry
William’s army was a combined-arms force, integrating archers, heavy cavalry, and infantry, each with specialised weapons.
Melee Weapons
- Norman Swords
- Type: Oakeshott Type X/XII arming swords.
- Length: ~80 cm (31 inches).
- Use: Versatile slashing/thrusting weapon for knights and infantry.
- Lances (Cavalry)
- Length: ~3 metres (10 feet).
- Use: Couched underarm for mounted charges to break shield walls.
- Spears & Polearms (Infantry)
- Use: Norman foot soldiers fought with spears, bills, and glaives for reach.
Ranged Weapons
- Bows (Self & Composite)
- Archers: A key Norman advantage.
- Rate of Fire: 6–10 arrows per minute.
- Effect: High-angle volleys weakened Saxon formations before assaults.
- Crossbows (Limited Use)
- Early crossbows may have been present but were rare in 1066.
Defensive Equipment
- Kite Shields
- Shape: Tall, teardrop design.
- Advantage: Protected mounted knights’ legs and deflected arrows better than round shields.
- Armour
- Knights: Full chainmail hauberks, conical helmets with nasal guards.
- Infantry: Lighter mail or padded armour; some with iron caps.
Key Weapon Comparisons
Weapon Type | Anglo-Saxon Forces | Norman Forces |
---|---|---|
Primary Melee | Dane axe, spear, sword | Sword, lance, spear |
Ranged | Rare (javelins) | Archers (critical advantage) |
Shields | Round (shield wall) | Kite (mounted/archer defence) |
Cavalry Arms | None | Lances, swords |
Armour | Housecarls: mail; Fyrd: minimal | Knights: full mail; infantry: mixed |
Tactical Impact of Weapons
- Norman Archers softened Saxon lines before cavalry charges.
- Saxon Shield Wall resisted initial assaults but faltered against feigned retreats.
- Cavalry Lances allowed Normans to exploit gaps in the shield wall.
- Dane Axes were deadly but left wielders vulnerable when overextended.
The superior combined-arms tactics of the Normans, paired with their ranged and cavalry advantages, ultimately overcame the Saxons’ defensive strength. The battle marked the end of the Anglo-Saxon era and the rise of Norman dominance in England.
Aftermath: A New England
- William was crowned King of England on Christmas Day 1066 at Westminster Abbey.
- Feudal System Imposed: Norman lords replaced Anglo-Saxon nobility.
- Castle Building: Motte-and-bailey fortifications (e.g., Tower of London) secured Norman rule.
- Domesday Book (1086): A comprehensive land survey to consolidate power.
- Language & Culture: Norman French blended with Old English, shaping modern English.

Legacy and Re-enactments
- Battle Abbey was built on the site where Harold fell, now a key historical landmark.
- Annual re-enactments feature:
- Hundreds of participants in authentic armour.
- Demonstrations of shield walls, cavalry charges, and archery.
- Living history encampments showcasing 11th-century life.
The Battle of Hastings heralded the birth of medieval England. From battlefield tactics to governance, language, and architecture, its impact endures nearly a millennium later. Whether studied by historians or re-enacted by enthusiasts, Hastings remains one of history’s most decisive clashes.
Watch the documentay: