The Battle of Pavia, fought on 24 February 1525, marked one of the defining clashes of the Italian Wars. It was a calamity for French arms and a glittering triumph for the Habsburgs, the sort of battle that shifted crowns and toppled reputations. King Francis I of France was captured, the French nobility butchered, and Italy left in Habsburg hands for a generation.
Below is a historian’s guided tour through the mud, gunpowder smoke and misplaced chivalry of that fateful morning outside the walls of Pavia.
Background
The Italian Wars had been raging for decades, with France and the Habsburgs squabbling over who ought to own Italy, as if it were a chessboard rather than a land of cities and loyalties. By 1525, Francis I marched south to reassert French dominance in Lombardy, laying siege to the city of Pavia. The Imperial forces under Charles de Lannoy and the redoubtable Georg von Frundsberg had no intention of yielding.
The stage was set for one of the most decisive battles of the sixteenth century.
Forces
| Side | Commanders | Estimated Troops | Composition |
|---|---|---|---|
| Kingdom of France | King Francis I, Charles de La Tremoille, Admiral Bonnivet | c. 23,000 | 8,000 Swiss and French infantry, 3,000 men-at-arms, 6,000 light cavalry, 60 cannon |
| Habsburg-Imperial | Charles de Lannoy, Georg von Frundsberg, Fernando d’Avalos (Marquis of Pescara), Charles de Bourbon | c. 20,000 | 12,000 Landsknechte, 3,000 Spanish arquebusiers, 3,000 cavalry, artillery support |
The French were strong in cavalry and cannon, but the Imperial side held the edge in infantry quality and, crucially, in the widespread use of the arquebus.
Leaders and Troop Composition
- Francis I of France
Personally led his men-at-arms. He was brave to the point of foolishness, still clinging to the romance of knightly combat in an age rapidly being defined by black powder. - Charles de Lannoy
Steady and pragmatic. His strategy relied on pinning the French and using the Imperial infantry to shred them. - Fernando d’Avalos, Marquis of Pescara
Ruthlessly effective, with a keen eye for how to use arquebusiers against plate-armoured horsemen. - Georg von Frundsberg
The veteran commander of the German Landsknechte, who famously told his men before battle that if they lost, they would all have their throats cut. No pressure then. - Charles de Bourbon
Once Constable of France, now a traitor leading Imperial troops against his former king. A bitter footnote to French history.
Arms and Armour
The battle is often cited as the beginning of the end for heavy cavalry dominance in European warfare.
- French Knights and Men-at-Arms
- Full plate harness, often Italian-made.
- Long lances, arming swords, and estocs for piercing mail.
- Some carried the Montante or two-handed sword, though these were more common among mercenaries.
- Swiss Pikemen
- Pikes 15–18 feet in length.
- Sidearms included short swords and Katzbalger (the wide, brutish sword beloved by mercenaries).
- Spanish Arquebusiers
- The real killers of the day. Wielded matchlock arquebuses capable of piercing armour at close range.
- Sidearms: swords such as the espada ropera.
- Landsknechte
- Pikemen in flamboyant slashed clothing.
- Doppelsöldner armed with massive two-handed Zweihänder.
- Their short Katzbalger swords were symbols of their profession.
Artillery played a role but was badly deployed by the French, neutralised early by Imperial manoeuvres.
The Battle Timeline
- Night of 23 February
Imperial troops manoeuvred under cover of darkness through the parkland around the Visconti Hunting Reserve. Their artillery was dragged into position with impressive stealth. - Dawn, 24 February
The French were caught in disarray. Imperial arquebusiers deployed in woodland and tall grass, firing at advancing cavalry. - Morning
Francis led a glorious but ill-advised cavalry charge. Arquebus fire tore into the knights, horses screamed and fell, the flower of French chivalry was left floundering. - Midday
The Swiss pikemen attempted to turn the tide, but Imperial Landsknechte fought them to a bloody stalemate. - Afternoon
Francis was surrounded, his horse killed under him. He fought bravely with sword in hand until overwhelmed. Taken prisoner, he was later sent to Spain.
Archaeology
Excavations around the battlefield have uncovered musket balls, armour fragments, and the remains of horses. A particularly grim find was a heap of skeletal remains showing the blunt trauma of pike and sword alongside the tell-tale entry wounds of arquebus shot.
Ironically, fragments of lavish armour have been found shattered or pierced, reminders that technological progress in warfare rarely cares for knightly honour.
Contemporary Voices
Francis I himself, writing to his mother after the disaster:
“To inform you of how all things have gone, of all things, nothing remains to me but honour, and my life which is saved.”
A gallant sentiment, though one imagines his nobles buried at Pavia might have raised an eyebrow.
The chronicler Martin du Bellay offered a blunt verdict:
“The battle was cruel, and the overthrow great. The French lost in it the flower of their nobility.”
Legacy
The Battle of Pavia was more than just a French defeat. It was the moment that proved gunpowder infantry could break armoured cavalry. It locked Italy under Habsburg control and left France reeling. Chivalry did not so much die at Pavia as get riddled with lead shot.
Francis eventually returned to France after signing the humiliating Treaty of Madrid, which he promptly repudiated. The Italian Wars, of course, went on, but the myth of the invincible knight never truly recovered.
The Seven Swords Takeaway
Pavia stands as a pivot between two ages: the pomp of medieval warfare and the pragmatism of early modern conflict. Francis charged in like a crusader, but his men fell like skittles to the arquebus. It is one of those battles where you can almost hear the page of history turning, along with the groans of dying warhorses and the crack of gunpowder.
Watch the documentary:
